Name:
Location: London, United Kingdom

Friday, June 24, 2005

Criteria

What are the criteria for this proposed new system? Firstly, and most obviously, to be successful it must offer the opportunity for every impeti to be satisfied. 21st century Imperial Capitalism achieves this to a certain degree in the West, whereas the system it defeated, the Command Economy, denied the possibility of the satisfaction of iPower to a great percentage of its members. This denial was written into a system that was intended to satisfy iHarmony above all other impeti, while ignoring the fact that iHarmony is never imposed, but is necessarily chosen. A system cannot provide satisfaction, it can merely provide the potential for it to be achieved. A system that denies potential - into which, sadly, Imperial Capitalism is degrading - will fail in its purpose.
Nothing written into our present system necessitates its failure, it merely makes it more likely if its extension continues to deny the potential of a great part of the world. We thus have our first criteria.
Secondly, it must encourage the production of net worth. To beat capitalism, it must do so as efficiently as possible. The two factors here are time and energy. The maximum of energy in the minimum amount of time is an obvious equation, but the method by which this can be produced is not so. It immediately becomes obvious that we have a potential conflict here: energy production may be more efficient if it decreases potential satisfaction. However, this is a mistake. The most efficient use of energy to achieve our two goals is to have members of the Greater Self producing net worth through whichever method best coheres with their empithym. After all, only the increase in power of the Greater Self can satisfy iPurpose.
This appears to present a dilemma: empithym are not focused in the manner of careers. People may, quite possibly, wish to do many things. How can we accomodate this? I believe I have the beginnings of a solution.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home